WINCE Campaign
Flight #97-045

Sample Image
click image!
06 February 1997
Track #02


Cloud obscured Lake Michigan northeast of Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
click image!
06 February 1997
Track #07


Partially frozen James Bay, Canada.

R: 2.15 microns
G: 0.95 microns
B: 0.65 microns
Summary Information
Date: February 06, 1997
ER-2 Flight Number: 97-045
Location: Wisconsin to Hudson Bay, Canada
Principal Investigator: Dr. Paul Menzel (Univ of Wisconsin)
Additional Sensors: HIS, CLS, MIR, EOC, APS, 12" RC-10 (NC)
Mission Objectives: Overfly thin to thick clouds over snow. Monitor transition from clouds over snow to clear snow to lake ice of Hudson Bay. Collect data for cross-calibration of MAS and HIS instruments. Underfly ADEOS for cross-calibration between POLDER and TSCC. Overfly ground instrumentation, including snow emissivity measurements with AERI at Madison and instruments at SSEC.

Level-1B Processing Information
Level-1B Data processed by: Ames Research Center
Level-1B Data Version: #10
Level-1B Configuration: (sample file)
Calibration Type: Final
Calibration Version: WINCE 1.0
Temperature Adjustment: No
Status: Completed with final calibration

Flight Track Map

click map!
Level-1B Browse Imagery
Straight Line Flight Tracks: 16
Scanlines Processed: 91203
Solar Azimuth and Zenith Angles
Browse Images
Click on the Flight Track number to load images.
Lat/Lon ranges are for the BEG-END scanline nadir pixels.
Flight
Track
Time_Span
(GMT)
Heading
(Deg)
Lat_Range
(Deg_N)
Lon_Range
(Deg_W)
Length
(Scanlines)
Altitude
(Meters)
1 17:50-18:23 8 45.72-49.46 88.88-87.49 12495 ~20000
2 18:24-18:57 11 49.43-53.08 87.47-85.69 12475 ~20000
3 18:57-19:23 14 53.09-55.95 85.68-84.05 9794 ~20000
4 19:25-19:46 82 56.02-56.02 83.81-79.13 7926 ~20000
5 19:48-20:04 213 55.85-54.17 78.97-80.42 6059 ~20000
6 20:04-20:37 211 54.17-50.66 80.45-83.10 12490 ~20000
7 20:37-21:11 208 50.65-47.07 83.10-85.39 12478 ~20000
8 21:11-21:21 207 47.06-46.03 85.38-85.98 3531 ~20000
9 21:21-21:28 196 45.98-45.24 86.01-86.23 1843 ~20000
10 21:28-21:30 194 45.20-44.98 86.24-86.30 711 ~20000
11 21:31-21:33 294 44.92-44.99 86.47-86.70 655 ~20000
12 21:35-21:44 211 44.92-44.01 86.94-87.62 3382 ~20000
13 21:45-21:49 187 43.92-43.36 87.66-87.71 1763 ~20000
14 21:50-21:53 202 43.33-42.93 87.71-87.89 1370 ~20000
15 21:56-21:59 296 42.91-43.07 88.23-88.66 1234 ~20000
16 22:00-22:07 274 43.10-43.10 88.79-89.75 2442 ~20000
Images 01 through 16 in sequence

Level-1B Data Distribution
NASA GSFC Earth Sciences (GES) Data Center
NASA DAAC's

Additional Information
The objective of this flight was to overfly thin to thick clouds over snow, monitor transition from clouds over snow to clear snow to lake ice of Hudson Bay, collect data for cross-calibration of MAS and HIS instruments, underfly ADEOS for cross-calibration between POLDER and TSCC, overfly ground instrumentation including snow emissivity measurements with AERI at Madison and instruments at SSEC. The ER-2 aircraft left Madison and flew northward to Hudson Bay. On that transit, it flew over dissipating clouds over nothern Wisconsin (with snow cover below), through a weak cold front over Lake Superior, and then into clear snow covered conditions in southern Canada. Hudson Bay had about 50% broken low cloud cover. After flying eastward across Hudson Bay, the ER-2 flew southward towards the north end of Lake Michigan. The pilot (Jim Barrilleaux) adjusted the flight pattern to cover clear water over the western shore of the Lake. Probably also picked up some shoreline as well. From there, pilot turned west and flew to Madison where he lined up on a 270 degree heading to overfly Lake Mendota. At this time cloud cover was dissipating over southern Wisconsin and Madison had broken, dissipating cloud. Pilot reported he could not see any cloud shadows over Madison on overpass,but reported cloud shadows over Hudson Bay. Interesting data over Hudson Bay for cloud mask testing. Some lake ice at northern end of Lake Michigan. At 21:35 GMT visible water with very thin low cloud was noted.

    There is incoherent line to line noise (cabeling) in channel 5 throughout the flight. Very poor data quality in this channel.(EXAMPLE)

    >There were numerous MAS Level-0 data gaps, which occurred between 21:22:37 GMT and 21:24:06 GMT during Flight Track #10. These gaps appear as a discontinuity streak in the browse imagery (EXAMPLE).

    Band #15 (1.91 microns) slowly degraded during this flight. Towards the end of the flight, this band exhibited excessive noise (EXAMPLE). Note that this effect may be present in other MAS port#2 bands.


Back to: [WINCE Campaign]

Another WINCE Flight?
#97-041 #97-042 #97-043 #97-044 #97-045
#97-046 #97-047 #97-048 #97-049 #97-050
Accessibility